Two New York State School Districts File Federal Funding Discrimination Claims

Kansas Court Allows Affluent District’s Claim to Move Forward
December 9, 2013
Connecticut Court Denies Motion to Dismiss; Case Now Set for Trial
December 9, 2013
Show all

Two New York State School Districts File Federal Funding Discrimination Claims

Late last month, the Schenectady City School District  and the Middletown City School District each filed a complaint with the Civil Rights Division of the United States Department of Litigation claiming that New York State’s current education funding system discriminates again African American and Latino Students.  The complaints, brought under Title VI of the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the federal Equal Educational Opportunity Act, allege that the substantial cuts in education funding that the state has imposed since the 2008 recession have a disparate impact on school districts such as theirs which have large numbers of minority students and English Language learners.  The districts allege that the neediest school districts are receiving a much smaller percentage of the Foundation Aid they were promised in 2007 than affluent districts.  Out of almost 700 school districts in New York, 138 districts are receiving 100 percent or more of the Foundation Aid they were promised, while 155 districts,  including the complainants, are receiving less than 70 percent of the Foundation Aid they were promised.

According to the complaints, the funding disparity has resulted in larger class sizes and higher student-to teacher ratios; cuts in and elimination of programs and electives and advanced placement courses; shortages of textbooks and resources; shortages of technology; insufficient physical education and extracurricular activities; insufficient library resources; and insufficient facilities.  The claims are being filed with the federal agency because under the U.S. Supreme Court’s ruling in thesis regulation guide uwo pay for technology article review http://bookclubofwashington.org/books/worldview-paper/14/ Viagra Super Force 100mg 60mg voluntary euthanasia persuasive essay go to site go to site book report ideas for highschool students generic viagra discussion forum click here source proofreading freelance rates nationally certified resume writer see write my essay please inventory system thesis proposal enter site enter site enter essay format mla here click here source link cover page for thesis proposal how do i write a customer satisfaction survey research paper xenotransplantation essay on house of lords reform china essay prednisone side affects https://web.ics.purdue.edu/~asub/?doc=buy-a-term-paper science resume tips Viagra buy now Alexander v. Sandoval, 532 U.S. 275 (2001), individual plaintiffs cannot bring Title VI discriminatory impact claims before the courts, but federal agencies are not precluded from enforcing such claims.

December 10, 2013

Comments are closed.